Daily "Recent Prince George's County News" updates were suspended in early March 2016. They were compiled primarily from retweets of news headlines. Those retweets continue, but in unformatted and unarchived form at PG-Politics-Briefs. To follow such headlines on a current basis, follow @pgpolitics on Twitter.
Showing posts with label Rosalind.Johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rosalind.Johnson. Show all posts

Sunday, March 06, 2011

Recent Prince George's County News (6 Mar 2011)

Public Safety
2011 Maryland General Assembly
Government & Politics
Education
  • KhadijahOnline So happy to be in the loop regarding the political issues affecting my county thanks to @PGD9Politico @pgpolitics and @pgcpsparents 
    • Sounds familiar. RT @pgcpsparents: County exec states money may found to help schools but it comes with strings. (cont) http://tl.gd/94re73  
    • Rather than cut pay of high administrators, school systems begin this whole "get rid of failing teachers" thing...
    • Teachers rarely get away with performing poorly if their leadership demands otherwise. Failing schools in PG are due to failing leadership. 
    • Citizens are disengaged from the political activities affecting them because 1 out of 3 people are either trying to be famous...
    •  ...or preoccupied with trying to avoid being homeless... 
    • Engagement will have to center around helping people meet needs of safety & security and membership & belonging
  • pgcpsparents: PGCPS to cut more than 600 teachers due to budget cuts according to Dr. William Hite 
    • PGCPS to cut 1300 positions due to budget cuts and poor fiscal mgmt and oversight .
  • PG.School.Violence:
Local (Municipalities)
Other

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Recent Prince George's County News (16 Jun 2010)

Public Safety
2010 Election
  • MD Politics Watch: Progressive Maryland Releases 2010 Scorecard http://bit.ly/9RI2rb Includes high scores for six PG delegates and senators
  • County Executive
    • Comment: Where does county exec candidate Gerron Levi stand on school violence? http://bit.ly/dz9nRy 
    • Reply from Gerron Levi - Comment: Where does county exec candidate Gerron Levi stand on school violence? http://bit.ly/c5TBN0 
  • Council District 9
    • rt @Tamara4Dist9 I am panelist at Homebuying and Foreclosure Prevention Forum, Clinton, Jun 19. More details at www.tamaradavisbrown.org. 
  • General Assembly District 23A
    • rt @Shukoor Just Spoke with the father of the Bowie High Student. Our schools should have zero tolerance for violence http://fb.me/zLROjqp0
  • Congress District 5
Other Politics
  • Post: PG scraps plan to revise zoning, growth policies in 2010 http://bit.ly/b9M63m Council cuts planning budget 10%, Chm Dernoga no comment 
Education
Other
Recent Candidate Filings:

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Washington Plaza $11,000,000 wasted

Thanks to  Sen. Muse and his interfering, micro-managing, oath-breaking colleagues the school system is now out $11 million with absolutely nothing to show for it--no benefit for the children and no new offices either. $11 million down the drain--completely wasted--thanks to a bunch of posturing politicians who thought it more important to score a cheap political point than to keep their promises to honor the Constitution and their oaths of office.

Also all the Maryland "Republicans" who think legislative courtesy overrides their oaths and the Constitution.

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:20 AM, <jls401@aol.com> wrote:
This is outrageous and exactly why PG County continues to have such a bottom-of-the-toilet reputation in education!!!! 11mil down the drain. How exasperating!!!! On this, the BOE should hang their heads in shame. To put the self-interest of the comfort of administrators and professionals above the needs of students is more than a disservice.
-----Original Message-----
From: marcy_canavan <marcy.canavan@gmail.com>
To: PrinceGeorges_Discussion@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:36 pm
Subject: [PrinceGeorges_Discussion] Washington Plaza - the finale
Well, folks. The outcome of the legislature's action is that the BOE will wind up paying more than 1/3 of the TOTAL cost of the building and have absolutely nothing to show for it.

And who will ever do business with the BOE will always wonder if a contract has any meaning?

$11 million that could have been spent on education. And thanks to the legislature there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to show for the $11 million!

AND since both the legislature and tonight, the BOE, did this as an "emergency," meaning that the public had essentially no chance to comment meaningfully before this happened.

After you read the article in the Post (below) tell me how proud you are of PG County.
----------------------------------------------
Board Retracts Lease for Headquarters
Canceled Deal, Which Will Cost System $11 Million, Succumbed to Legislative Pressure

The Prince George's County Board of Education last night voted to back out of a lease for a new headquarters, in response to the Maryland General Assembly's passage of a bill that would strip the school system of millions of dollars in education aid unless officials killed the project.

But the school board's 5 to 2 vote to terminate the deal will draw a penalty of $4.8 million, officials said, bringing the school system's total cost for the venture in rent and other expenses to $11 million. The move into a new headquarters will be canceled, and the old headquarters will remain operating.

As they debated what to do, board members voiced dismay.

"So it's a total of $11 million, that if the board votes on this, we have nothing to show for?" asked board member Pat Fletcher (District 3).

"This is nothing more than blackmail," said board member Rosalind A. Johnson (District 1). She and Fletcher voted against the lease-termination measure in the meeting at Laurel High School.

Board Chairman Verjeana M. Jacobs (At Large) abstained, and board member R. Owen Johnson Jr. (District 5) was absent.

Board Vice Chairman Ron Watson (At Large), part of the five-member majority in the vote, said his goal was to cut losses. "At this point, it's all about minimizing further exposure to the county," Watson said. "I still think the legislature has overstepped."

The plan to move into an office complex in Upper Marlboro along the Pennsylvania Avenue corridor, near Andrews Air Force Base, became a target of criticism from state lawmakers and county residents soon after the sharply divided school board approved a $36 million lease-purchase deal for the buildings last June.

The buildings were supposed to have consolidated scattered school offices into a central place, saving the system money long-term. The project also was meant to replace the aging, decrepit Sasscer Administration Building in Upper Marlboro with attractive buildings befitting a 128,000-student school system that is the state's second-largest.

But the complex has been nearly vacant for almost a year, even as the school system paid $262,500 a month in rent. The initial $36 million price tag, spread over 10 years, also did not include millions of dollars in moving and renovation costs.

State legislators said spending on the buildings could not be justified when the school system was closing eight schools and eliminating 900 jobs because of the economy. The General Assembly pressed forward with a bill that essentially orders the school system to cancel the headquarters plan, or lose $36 million in education funding. The bill passed in April. As of last night, Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) had not acted on it.

Jacobs and Watson signed the agreement immediately after the meeting. The agreement had already been signed by the building's owner, Dean F. Morehouse, president of MTM Builder/Developer Inc.

Asked about the $11 million cost to the school system for a project that went off the rails, Jacobs said: "It's bothersome. It's very bothersome."

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

General Assembly hypocrites attack school board plans

(Posted 10 Dec 2008)

Comment:  Although I believe that the school board's plan to spend $36 million on new headquarters was an extremely dumb move, I am disgusted by the hypocrisy of our General Assembly members who spent millions and millions and millions of dollars on their own office buildings in Annapolis over the past few years--taking money away from schools and helping to create the state's huge deficit--but now criticize the school board for doing the same thing on a smaller scale.

Headquarters Move Bugs State Officials; Lawmakers Cite Troubled Economy, Press Board to Be Honest About Costs.
Post, 10 Dec 2008 (Hernandez).
State lawmakers from Prince George's County grilled the school board this week on a $36 million headquarters move, saying they were worried the project would divert money from classrooms during a recession and make it harder for them to argue for education funding in Annapolis.

The planned headquarters at Washington Plaza, an office park not far from the Capital Beltway and Andrews Air Force Base, has been an object of heated debate since the school board voted 6 to 4 in June to approve a 10-year lease-purchase agreement.

The deal's supporters celebrated their success, saying it would allow the school system to move out of its moldering central administrative building in Upper Marlboro, save money by consolidating offices across the county and provide parents with most school-related services in one location.
ad_icon

But that was before the country entered a financial crisis and the state faced a $1 billion budget shortfall. Now, lawmakers are deeply pessimistic that they will be able to maintain funding for education during the upcoming legislative session.

In a meeting Monday night in Upper Marlboro, Del. Joanne C. Benson (D-Prince George's) asked the board to be "honest" about the property's costs. Sen. Nathaniel Exum (D-Prince George's) chimed in a few minutes later: "Everywhere I go in my district, there is no support for this Washington Plaza or whatever it is."

Other lawmakers weighed in. "I know that when you're doing a whole system move, it's going to be extremely expensive," said Del. Aisha N. Braveboy (D-Prince George's). "These expenses, for the leases and the cost of moving and the cost of retrofitting, are all taken out of operating expenses, which is the classroom."

School board Chairman Verjeana M. Jacobs (At Large) and Vice Chairman Ron L. Watson (At Large) said that a new deal the school system is pursuing would save the schools $390,000 a year by consolidating staff buildings scattered across the county. Yet the current 10-year lease-purchase deal, according to a fact sheet the school system provided to lawmakers, costs the system $156,000 more per year. The new deal, equivalent to a 30-year mortgage, is expected to be in place early next year.

After the meeting, Jacobs said: "It is a cost savings. It is almost as if people don't want to believe that, but it is. There are new state buildings going up all the time. . . . We all recognize that there comes a time when you have a need to consolidate services. We believe that this project does exactly that."

"There are still some questions in terms of the money and the computations and their accuracy," said Del. Melony G. Griffith (D-Prince George's), the new chairman of the Prince George's House delegation. "I would say at this juncture that there is concern about the decision to proceed, but there is also an understanding that decisions are made with the information that people have at the time decisions are made. . . . I don't think any of us were aware of the depth of what we were facing."

School board members have long recognized the sensitivity of the issue. When the board was voting on the lease six months ago, Heather Iliff (District 2), who supported the lease, warned that the decision could turn the board into "a political punching bag." John E. Deasy, the superintendent at the time, strongly urged the board not to approve the lease. A spokesman for County Executive Jack B. Johnson said the time was not right for the long-sought office move.

"We just need to continue articulating to the community that this is a benefit to the community and a benefit to students," Watson said Monday night.

"It may be a good idea, but not today, not this week, not this month, not this year," said Del. Barbara A. Frush (D-Prince George's). "It's just very bad timing."

Frush said the project will complicate efforts to preserve state school funding when the legislature meets next month.

"It will be problematic," she said. "Everybody's going to have their hand out. And they'll have their hand out for better reasons than a new building."

Staff writer Rosalind S. Helderman contributed to this report.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

School Board Members Support Higher Taxes (Question F)

(Posted 23 Oct 2008)

School board voices support for phone tax; But members disagree over slots; discussions focus on whether initiatives would benefit education.
Gazette, 23 Oct 2008 (King ).
The Prince George's County school board unanimously approved a resolution Oct. 16 to support the telecommunications tax increase to bring additional revenue to the school system but could not agree on a position for the controversial slots referendum that will be on the Nov. 4 ballot in Maryland.
* * *
Board member Heather Iliff (Dist. 2) and board vice-chairman Ron L. Watson (At-Large) did not attend the meeting.
* * * [Full story ]
So, the members voting for higher taxes were:


Comment:  The proposed tax increase is expected to generate about $17 million.  It will pay for little under half of the cost of the new school system headquarters recently approved by the board.  And it will leave Prince George's County with the highest telephone tax rate in the state and among the very highest in the whole country.

Earlier

Thursday, November 08, 2007

School Board wants more money

(Posted 8 Nov 2007)
School leaders make request: Fully fund our public schools.
Gazette, 8 Nov 2007 (Letter).
We strongly support full funding of the ‘‘Thornton” Bridge to Excellence in Public Schools Act and oppose the proposals to cut education funding in the next year’s state budget.

We ask that you contact your delegates and senators in the General Assembly to urge their support for full funding for the Bridge To Excellence Act. Remind your elected officials of their constitutional duty to provide the funding amount mandated in the Thornton law. Let your voice be heard that any package of proposals considered by the General Assembly should include:
* * *
Prince George’s County school board members R. Owen Johnson Jr., Verjeana M. Jacobs, Donna Hathaway Beck, Pat J. Fletcher, Heather Iliff, Rosalind A. Johnson, Linda Thornton Thomas, Amber P. Waller, Ron L. Watson,Haywood L. Perry III (studentmember) and schools Superintendent John E. Deasy

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Re: [PrinceGeorges_Discussion] Fwd: PG Hospital - What should be done?

Maybe I'm reading the current situation wrong, but it seems to me that there are three possible scenarios at this time:

1. Shut it down. This seems to be the alternative preferred by the failed management of Dimensions, and possibly by the state officials who seem to feel snubbed because when their plan failed they lost their opportunity to take control but make county residents pay higher taxes for what would become a state hospital.

2. Find some way to slap on another band-aid, continue to reward Dimensions management, and hope for a miracle next year. This appears to be the alternative preferred by county officials who have repeatedly demonstrated over several years both a lack of will and a lack of competence to deal effectively with the hospital.

3. File for bankruptcy and let the federal bankruptcy court deal with the problem. This solution seems to be opposed by Dimensions management, who would lose control, and ignored by our elected officials.

Personally, I'm inclined toward the bankruptcy option. Yes, it might lead to closing the hospital. But there is probably a better chance that a bankruptcy reorganization would give us new management, fresh ideas, with deadlines to be observed, remove the people who have brought us the problem, and also remove from the picture the politicians who have repeatedly betrayed us with rhetoric and inaction.

On 4/11/07, Jacob Andoh <jyandoh@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks to Mr. Rick Tyler for sharing.


Note: forwarded message attached.

,_
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ArthurTurner <arthurturner@verizon.net>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:26:07 -0400
Subject: [Fwd: PG Hospital - What should be done?]


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PG Hospital - What should be done?
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:06:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: ARTEERICK@aol.com
To: ARTEERICK@aol.com


Below, you will find the original PG Hospital bill information proposed by the PG House Delegation followed by a FAQ Sheet, series of articles and map showing other hospitals serving Prince George's, except the often forgotten Ft. Washington Hospital.
You would have to defer to our state and county elected officials to get more specific and updated information regarding the history and negotiations that led to the current PG Hospital status.
However, a couple of issues appear to be clear:
- This is a public hospital, so the public should be kept informed in a timely manner and play some role directly and indirectly in all decisions related to it
- PG Hospital is in financial and management trouble
- It serves over 180,000 patients and many may not have a reasonable alternative nor reasonable access to other health facilities
- Both the County and State have direct responsibility of the hospital operations, especially from a financial point which requires oversight from those who management such funds
- A new management system, company or organization is required to maintain its public status while ensuring that the hospital improves the quality and quantity of staff and operational resources required to operate successfully and profitable such a major health care facility.
Since any future decisions appear to rely directly or directly with our elected state and county officials, perhaps they need updated input from the public directly to have them collaboratively and collectively come up with a reasonable solution based first on consensus and not political or territorial issues, especially since there is joint financial responsibility.
If you have responsible concerns, questions, ideas or solutions, perhaps you may want to share them using the contact information below.
Where does Rick stand? Like many of you, I am not sure I have enough information to state a responsible opinion. However, based on the information I have, it appears that having the University of Maryland (teaching) Hospital system is an excellent start combined with a shared agreement on the financial, accountability and management systems shared by the state and county since neither has sole responsibility or the financial resources on their own.
I hope this helps our leaders come up with a real solutions short and long term soon that considers the input and needs of their entire public first.
How to contact your PG State General Assembly Members - http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/07leg/html/gacopg.html
How to Contact Office of the Governor Staff http://www.gov.state.md.us/staff.asp
University of Maryland Medical System - Acquisition of Prince George's County Hospital System PG 418-07
Hospital Executive Holds Out No Hope
Pr. George's Leaders Say Efforts to Save System Continue

By Rosalind S. Helderman and Ovetta Wiggins
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, April 11, 2007; A01

Surrounded by scores of grim hospital employees, the chief executive of the ailing Prince George's County hospital network said yesterday that he saw no option but to close the system, as state and local officials traded blame for the failure of a compromise to save it.

After a deal collapsed in the waning moments of Maryland's 90-day legislative session Monday, state officials said the three hospitals and two nursing homes in the county-owned system could close as soon as June, and they pledged $20 million toward an "orderly" shutdown. Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) and many lawmakers blamed the County Council for foiling the deal.

County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D) and council members said they will continue working to keep the facilities open.

"I cannot throw in the towel," Johnson said at a news conference yesterday.

Across the Washington region, health-care providers began to sound alarms about a closure's effect on the region's hospital network. The Prince George's system treats 180,000 patients a year -- many of them uninsured. Where would they go? What would happen to the 3,100 trauma patients a year taken to Prince George's Hospital Center's busy emergency room in Cheverly? And what about the 3,500 babies born each year at the hospital?

"The closing is going to upset the equilibrium of the entire [trauma] system," said Ronna Borenstein, a spokeswoman for Suburban Hospital in Bethesda

G.T. Dunlop Ecker, president and chief executive of Dimensions Healthcare System, which manages the hospital system, said he will convene an emergency meeting of the board of directors Monday to consider bankruptcy court protection or closure. He said that the hospital system does not have enough money to survive bankruptcy proceedings and that he will advise shuttering instead.

"I agree that it's hard to believe we're going to shut down, but at the moment, I see no other alternative," he said.

State Secretary of Health John M. Colmers said that county health facilities could close as early as June and that his office has been working with the Maryland Hospital Association and the organization that coordinates the statewide emergency medical services on reallocating patients.

But Johnson said he was looking for the $30 million necessary to keep the hospital running for the next year. He pledged to keep working with the nine-member council to reach an agreement on the best way to proceed. He said talk of a closure was "not appropriate."

O'Malley (D) did not share Johnson's optimism. He said that he is "always willing to continue to talk" but that discussions at this point must take place between the council and the county executive.

O'Malley had hoped the General Assembly would pass a bill to establish a state-appointed authority to manage the hospital. The authority would have shepherded the hospital through a transition period, taking over from Dimensions and eventually selling the system to another company. The authority would have taken over the hospital's land and buildings, which are owned by the county and leased for $1 a year to Dimensions.

The deal would have cost $329 million over eight years, with $170.3 million from the county and $158.7 million from the state. O'Malley and Johnson both indicated their support for the deal. Legislative leaders said they, too, were willing to tackle the procedural machinations necessary to pass the bill in the final hours of the session.

But Council Chairman Camille Exum (D-Seat Pleasant) said early Monday evening that the council could not commit to the deal. State lawmakers said they were unwilling to endorse the package without the approval of the council, which would be responsible for yearly appropriations to the hospital.

The County Council "apparently didn't realize the importance of coming together," O'Malley said yesterday.

A chorus of officials yesterday blamed council intransigence for the failure to reach a deal. Ecker called the council's actions a "profound breach of public trust," and Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert) said council members had "performed a great disservice" to county residents. Del. Doyle L. Niemann (D-Prince George's) accused them of "sabotage."

All nine council members stood together at a news conference yesterday afternoon and defended their actions. They said the deal had been put together hastily, left unanswered questions about hospital assets and did not provide a comprehensive, long-term solution for the hospital's problems.

"We believe this was a bigger Band-Aid, and we will not be supportive of those efforts," Exum said.

Council members said they also could not agree to an eight-year plan because it would tie the hands of future officeholders.

Exum called on all sides to "come back to the table" to discuss the next steps -- although she insisted that the hospital system's future would be determined by Dimensions, a private company, and not the county or state.

Health-care providers from across the Washington region worried about the ripple effect a closure would have on their hospitals and on the delivery of health services, especially to the county's uninsured residents.

Michael J. Chiaramonte, chief executive of Southern Maryland Hospital in Clinton, said a shutdown at Prince George's could create a "medical malady." Longer trips might discourage some sick people from seeking treatment, he said, and might delay treatment for people who are critically ill.

James F. Caldas, president of Washington Hospital Center, said his hospital and others in the area are already "under siege" because of the closure of D.C. General in 2000. Washington Hospital Center has had a 46 percent increase in admissions through the emergency room, from 13,000 to 19,000. "The safety net is at its breaking point," Caldas said.

Prince George's Hospital Center also has a neonatal unit that treats some of the region's most fragile premature babies.

"If the hospital closes . . . I don't know what in the name of God we'll do. It's the only show in town," said Mary Jelacic, executive director of the Pregnancy Aid Center in College Park, which provides prenatal care to about 600 poor and uninsured women a year.

Hospital employees said they are still hoping for good news.

"We're in a state of shock and denial," said Kathleen Walker, who has worked as an administrator at the hospital for 32 years.

Staff writers Nelson Hernandez, Mary Otto and Lisa Rein contributed to this report.

========================================================

Q & A

How soon might the hospital close?

Unclear. The board meets Monday to decide on a bankruptcy filing or a shutdown. State officials say as early as June.

Who uses the hospital system?

180,000 patients a year, 80 percent from Prince George's County; 50 percent are uninsured. System specialties: trauma care, obstetrics, seniors, long-term patients.

Who works in the hospital system?

2,300 doctors, nurses and other staff; $175 million annual payroll.

Why are the system's trauma centers so important?

Prince George's Hospital Center handles 48,000 emergencies a year; Laurel, 36,000; Bowie Health, 38,000. Doctors warn of longer trips to other hospitals and increased crowding at remaining trauma centers.

Where else could patients go?

Suburban in Bethesda, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Washington Hospital Center in the District, Holy Cross in Silver Spring, Washington Adventist in Takoma Park, Southern Maryland Hospital Center, Doctors Community in Prince George's, and trauma centers in Baltimore and Washington.

How full are nearby hospitals?

At or near capacity. When a hospital is over capacity, it has a "yellow alert." Washington Adventist had 20 yellow alerts last month; Doctors Community, 20; Suburban, one.

Sources: Dimensions Healthcare System, Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems, Maryland Health Care Commission, Maryland Hospital Association, Washington Hospital Center.

===================================================

By Mary Kate Cannistra, The Washington Post - April 11, 2007
Rick Tyler *** arteerick@aol.com