1. Shut it down. This seems to be the alternative preferred by the failed management of Dimensions, and possibly by the state officials who seem to feel snubbed because when their plan failed they lost their opportunity to take control but make county residents pay higher taxes for what would become a state hospital.
2. Find some way to slap on another band-aid, continue to reward Dimensions management, and hope for a miracle next year. This appears to be the alternative preferred by county officials who have repeatedly demonstrated over several years both a lack of will and a lack of competence to deal effectively with the hospital.
3. File for bankruptcy and let the federal bankruptcy court deal with the problem. This solution seems to be opposed by Dimensions management, who would lose control, and ignored by our elected officials.
Personally, I'm inclined toward the bankruptcy option. Yes, it might lead to closing the hospital. But there is probably a better chance that a bankruptcy reorganization would give us new management, fresh ideas, with deadlines to be observed, remove the people who have brought us the problem, and also remove from the picture the politicians who have repeatedly betrayed us with rhetoric and inaction.
---------- Forwarded message ----------Thanks to Mr. Rick Tyler for sharing.
Note: forwarded message attached.
From: ArthurTurner <email@example.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:26:07 -0400
Subject: [Fwd: PG Hospital - What should be done?]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PG Hospital - What should be done? Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:06:53 -0400 (EDT) From: ARTEERICK@aol.com To: ARTEERICK@aol.com
Below, you will find the original PG Hospital bill information proposed by the PG House Delegation followed by a FAQ Sheet, series of articles and map showing other hospitals serving Prince George's, except the often forgotten Ft. Washington Hospital.You would have to defer to our state and county elected officials to get more specific and updated information regarding the history and negotiations that led to the current PG Hospital status.However, a couple of issues appear to be clear:- This is a public hospital, so the public should be kept informed in a timely manner and play some role directly and indirectly in all decisions related to it- PG Hospital is in financial and management trouble- It serves over 180,000 patients and many may not have a reasonable alternative nor reasonable access to other health facilities- Both the County and State have direct responsibility of the hospital operations, especially from a financial point which requires oversight from those who management such funds- A new management system, company or organization is required to maintain its public status while ensuring that the hospital improves the quality and quantity of staff and operational resources required to operate successfully and profitable such a major health care facility.Since any future decisions appear to rely directly or directly with our elected state and county officials, perhaps they need updated input from the public directly to have them collaboratively and collectively come up with a reasonable solution based first on consensus and not political or territorial issues, especially since there is joint financial responsibility.If you have responsible concerns, questions, ideas or solutions, perhaps you may want to share them using the contact information below.Where does Rick stand? Like many of you, I am not sure I have enough information to state a responsible opinion. However, based on the information I have, it appears that having the University of Maryland (teaching) Hospital system is an excellent start combined with a shared agreement on the financial, accountability and management systems shared by the state and county since neither has sole responsibility or the financial resources on their own.I hope this helps our leaders come up with a real solutions short and long term soon that considers the input and needs of their entire public first.How to contact your PG State General Assembly Members - http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/07leg/html/gacopg.htmlHow to Contact Office of the Governor Staff http://www.gov.state.md.us/staff.aspCounty Executive - http://www.co.pg.md.us/Government/ExecutiveBranch/executive_staff.asp?nivel=subfoldmenu(0,1 )PG County Council - http://www.co.pg.md.us/Government/LegislativeBranch/index.asp?nivel=subfoldmenu(0,0 )University of Maryland Medical System - Acquisition of Prince George's County Hospital System PG 418-07Hospital Executive Holds Out No Hope
Pr. George's Leaders Say Efforts to Save System Continue
By Rosalind S. Helderman and Ovetta Wiggins
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, April 11, 2007; A01
Surrounded by scores of grim hospital employees, the chief executive of the ailing Prince George's County hospital network said yesterday that he saw no option but to close the system, as state and local officials traded blame for the failure of a compromise to save it.
After a deal collapsed in the waning moments of Maryland's 90-day legislative session Monday, state officials said the three hospitals and two nursing homes in the county-owned system could close as soon as June, and they pledged $20 million toward an "orderly" shutdown. Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) and many lawmakers blamed the County Council for foiling the deal.
County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D) and council members said they will continue working to keep the facilities open.
"I cannot throw in the towel," Johnson said at a news conference yesterday.
Across the Washington region, health-care providers began to sound alarms about a closure's effect on the region's hospital network. The Prince George's system treats 180,000 patients a year -- many of them uninsured. Where would they go? What would happen to the 3,100 trauma patients a year taken to Prince George's Hospital Center's busy emergency room in Cheverly? And what about the 3,500 babies born each year at the hospital?
"The closing is going to upset the equilibrium of the entire [trauma] system," said Ronna Borenstein, a spokeswoman for Suburban Hospital in Bethesda
G.T. Dunlop Ecker, president and chief executive of Dimensions Healthcare System, which manages the hospital system, said he will convene an emergency meeting of the board of directors Monday to consider bankruptcy court protection or closure. He said that the hospital system does not have enough money to survive bankruptcy proceedings and that he will advise shuttering instead.
"I agree that it's hard to believe we're going to shut down, but at the moment, I see no other alternative," he said.
State Secretary of Health John M. Colmers said that county health facilities could close as early as June and that his office has been working with the Maryland Hospital Association and the organization that coordinates the statewide emergency medical services on reallocating patients.
But Johnson said he was looking for the $30 million necessary to keep the hospital running for the next year. He pledged to keep working with the nine-member council to reach an agreement on the best way to proceed. He said talk of a closure was "not appropriate."
O'Malley (D) did not share Johnson's optimism. He said that he is "always willing to continue to talk" but that discussions at this point must take place between the council and the county executive.
O'Malley had hoped the General Assembly would pass a bill to establish a state-appointed authority to manage the hospital. The authority would have shepherded the hospital through a transition period, taking over from Dimensions and eventually selling the system to another company. The authority would have taken over the hospital's land and buildings, which are owned by the county and leased for $1 a year to Dimensions.
The deal would have cost $329 million over eight years, with $170.3 million from the county and $158.7 million from the state. O'Malley and Johnson both indicated their support for the deal. Legislative leaders said they, too, were willing to tackle the procedural machinations necessary to pass the bill in the final hours of the session.
But Council Chairman Camille Exum (D-Seat Pleasant) said early Monday evening that the council could not commit to the deal. State lawmakers said they were unwilling to endorse the package without the approval of the council, which would be responsible for yearly appropriations to the hospital.
The County Council "apparently didn't realize the importance of coming together," O'Malley said yesterday.
A chorus of officials yesterday blamed council intransigence for the failure to reach a deal. Ecker called the council's actions a "profound breach of public trust," and Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert) said council members had "performed a great disservice" to county residents. Del. Doyle L. Niemann (D-Prince George's) accused them of "sabotage."
All nine council members stood together at a news conference yesterday afternoon and defended their actions. They said the deal had been put together hastily, left unanswered questions about hospital assets and did not provide a comprehensive, long-term solution for the hospital's problems.
"We believe this was a bigger Band-Aid, and we will not be supportive of those efforts," Exum said.
Council members said they also could not agree to an eight-year plan because it would tie the hands of future officeholders.
Exum called on all sides to "come back to the table" to discuss the next steps -- although she insisted that the hospital system's future would be determined by Dimensions, a private company, and not the county or state.
Health-care providers from across the Washington region worried about the ripple effect a closure would have on their hospitals and on the delivery of health services, especially to the county's uninsured residents.
Michael J. Chiaramonte, chief executive of Southern Maryland Hospital in Clinton, said a shutdown at Prince George's could create a "medical malady." Longer trips might discourage some sick people from seeking treatment, he said, and might delay treatment for people who are critically ill.
James F. Caldas, president of Washington Hospital Center, said his hospital and others in the area are already "under siege" because of the closure of D.C. General in 2000. Washington Hospital Center has had a 46 percent increase in admissions through the emergency room, from 13,000 to 19,000. "The safety net is at its breaking point," Caldas said.
Prince George's Hospital Center also has a neonatal unit that treats some of the region's most fragile premature babies.
"If the hospital closes . . . I don't know what in the name of God we'll do. It's the only show in town," said Mary Jelacic, executive director of the Pregnancy Aid Center in College Park, which provides prenatal care to about 600 poor and uninsured women a year.
Hospital employees said they are still hoping for good news.
"We're in a state of shock and denial," said Kathleen Walker, who has worked as an administrator at the hospital for 32 years.
Staff writers Nelson Hernandez, Mary Otto and Lisa Rein contributed to this report.
Q & A
How soon might the hospital close?
Unclear. The board meets Monday to decide on a bankruptcy filing or a shutdown. State officials say as early as June.
Who uses the hospital system?
180,000 patients a year, 80 percent from Prince George's County; 50 percent are uninsured. System specialties: trauma care, obstetrics, seniors, long-term patients.
Who works in the hospital system?
2,300 doctors, nurses and other staff; $175 million annual payroll.
Why are the system's trauma centers so important?
Prince George's Hospital Center handles 48,000 emergencies a year; Laurel, 36,000; Bowie Health, 38,000. Doctors warn of longer trips to other hospitals and increased crowding at remaining trauma centers.
Where else could patients go?
Suburban in Bethesda, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Washington Hospital Center in the District, Holy Cross in Silver Spring, Washington Adventist in Takoma Park, Southern Maryland Hospital Center, Doctors Community in Prince George's, and trauma centers in Baltimore and Washington.
How full are nearby hospitals?
At or near capacity. When a hospital is over capacity, it has a "yellow alert." Washington Adventist had 20 yellow alerts last month; Doctors Community, 20; Suburban, one.
Sources: Dimensions Healthcare System, Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems, Maryland Health Care Commission, Maryland Hospital Association, Washington Hospital Center.
===================================================By Mary Kate Cannistra, The Washington Post - April 11, 2007Rick Tyler *** firstname.lastname@example.org