Daily "Recent Prince George's County News" updates were suspended in early March 2016. They were compiled primarily from retweets of news headlines. Those retweets continue, but in unformatted and unarchived form at PG-Politics-Briefs. To follow such headlines on a current basis, follow @pgpolitics on Twitter.
Showing posts with label TRIM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TRIM. Show all posts

Sunday, March 25, 2012

House Ways & Means Committee Vote on SB 848

How Prince George's County delegates voted in committee on 16 Mar 2012:
http://mlis.state.md.us/2012rs/votes_comm/sb0848_w&m.pdf

Yea (a vote to override TRIM):
Nay: None

Abstain:
Excused

Reply to Patricia Douglas Re:"TRIM is about to be dead - What a glorious day!"

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Patricia Douglas <patriciadouglas08@yahoo.com> wrote:
For those who have lived with TRIM over the decades and understood its covert intent to starve a growing majority-black county of adequate services, this is about to be a glorious day. Shortly, the Governor will sign away the 34 year-old TRIM cap into the trash bin of history and there isn't anything the odd collection of conservatives on these list-serves can do about it. So much for this third rail of local politics.
The simple fact is that, according to a variety of sources, Prince George's County residents bear about the heaviest tax burden in the area and receive among the poorest services for their high taxes. 

Put together, and compared to other jurisdictions in the region, we pay the most taxes and get the worst results.

This year the General Assembly is working hard to pass a number of tax and fee increases that will cost the average Prince George's County household hundreds of dollars, delivering a crushing blow to the average African-American family in the county.

In addition, dishonestly titled SB 848 will take away the past and future ability of Prince George's County residents to control tax increases. It is effectively an attack against goth home rule and the voting rights of the black majority in Prince George's County. And there apparently isn't anything the African-American victims of the bill can do about it. 

TRIM was an effort to rein in rapacious politicians who kept raising taxes supposedly to fund education and public services, then spent the money elsewhere and kept repeating the cycle of raising taxes for one thing and spending it on another. Since we pay the most in taxes now, I hate to think how much more we would have been paying without TRIM.

Just four years ago the General Assembly passed a huge tax increase to fund their accumulated deficit.  Then they went on another spending binge and are back for more.  I don't know where the money went, I certainly haven't seen any improvement in services.

If Ms. Douglas really believes that the sending TRIM into the trash bin of history will improve services, I can probably get her a good price on a bridge to Brooklyn or some swamp land in Florida. Personally, I think her message proves the phrase attributed to P. T. Barnum.


And Ms. Douglas replied (ignoring the substance of my message):

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Patricia Douglas
Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PrinceGeorges_Discussion] TRIM is about to be dead - What a glorious day!
To: PrinceGeorges_Discussion@yahoogroups.com, "Diane C. Russell"
Cc: PG-Politics@yahoogroups.com

I would expect this response from you, Ms. Russell.  You are one of the ring leaders of the "odd collection" of online conservatives I was talking about, who can't stand the fact that they don't matter now in the politics of this county.  You've never met a negative story or spin about county leaders that you wouldn't sensationalize (or positive news about the county that you weren't intent on ignoring).  

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Re: New Fiscal Bind in PG / MNCPPC Tax Cap Needs Gov Signature

County Executive candidate Rushern Baker has asked Gov. O'Malley to veto the tax relief bill discussed by Judy Robinson below.

Baker: O'Malley should veto Pr. Geo's tax measure

Here's something you don't see very often: A candidate coming out against a tax break in an election year.

Former Del. Rushern L. Baker III (D), who is running for Prince George's County Executive, said Gov. Martin O'Malley should veto a bill on his desk that would give residents a tax break because it could also impair the county's ability to avoid furloughing workers in this year's budget. ...

Baker, for those of you who may not have been here, or may have forgotten, was the county elected official most responsible for bypassing TRIM and giving us one of the highest telephone taxes in the country.  His campaign's "The Pledge for PG" omits any pledge to honor TRIM or to to avoid or limit tax increases.

Candidate Gerron Levi (D-23A) who has voted for tax increases in the past, does want Gov. O'Malley to sign the bill.

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:53 PM, robinsonawjr <robinsonawjr@yahoo.com> wrote:
FYI: See Washington Post Article re cap on MNCPPC taxes below. I was told by a county council person we already had this break. Montgomery County has enjoyed it for years.

Taxpayers have given the county $60 million from the Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission budget 2 years running to help it close the budget gap. We were promised, however, by state delegates that this wouldn't damage the Commission and its services. Park and Planning, in the past, took over services previously performed by the county because it could raise money without taxpayers believing that TRIM was under assault again.

As we know we are in an economic downturn with property values tanking. Prince George's County has one of the highest forclosures in the state. It is essential that we rebuild the county's reputation and services without scaring off potential residents with high taxes and few services. In the coming months, I will be exploring initiating the Truth iN Taxation II committee. We will look at how to return taxes to residents and still maintain basic, essential services. I will be talking to groups in the county after the election that have done an excellent job of putting forward candidates and making change. More laster on effort.



Tax relief could reopen budget gap in Prince George's, Md.

By Jonathan Mummolo
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, April 25, 2010; C01



At the close of the Maryland General Assembly session this month, the fiscal prospects for Prince George's County were looking up. County Executive Jack B. Johnson said that schools would be better funded and that there would be no need to furlough or layoff county employees, thanks in part to a hard-won increase in state aid of $18 million.

But a bill awaiting Gov. Martin O'Malley's signature complicates that scenario, and also puts the governor in a political bind, because it would mean a loss of tax revenue in the county -- to the tune of about $18 million.

The bill would place a cap on taxes that county residents pay to the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, an agency that serves Prince George's and Montgomery counties. The cap, because of the way it would be applied, would cost the commission $18 million in the next fiscal year, and Prince George's has been relying on the commission to supplement its operating budget.

If O'Malley (D) signs the bill, he could reduce the revenue available to the county in a tough budget cycle. If he vetoes it, he takes a tax break away from a populous county in an election year -- a risky move when his Republican opponent, former Maryland governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., has made cutting taxes a central plank of his campaign platform.

A spokesman for the governor said right after the legislative session that O'Malley would sign the measure. But when asked this week, another aide said O'Malley was still weighing the "pros and cons."

"The governor is still reviewing that particular piece of legislation," said O'Malley spokesman Rick Abbruzzese. "There are pros and cons to this bill, the pros being, obviously, the tax cut for the residents of Prince George County, and that needs to be balanced with the loss of revenue."

County Council Chairman Thomas E. Dernoga (D-Laurel) said he and the other council members -- who have final say over the commission and county budgets -- are discussing options for dealing with the potential revenue loss.

"It certainly complicates getting to zero furlough days and fully funding the education budget," Dernoga said of the projected revenue loss. "The concern that Park and Planning has raised is whether they will be able to come up with the full amount of funding the executive has put in his budget. . . . Getting $18 million in one hand to deal with our budget woes while giving up $18 million on the other hand, we don't end up being any closer to solving our problem."

The bi-county park and planning agency has separate budgets for its Montgomery and Prince George's operations, and Montgomery has had a cap on commission taxes for years. The commission's budget for Prince George's is also separate from the county government's budget, but the loss of revenue could still affect county finances.

The county budget proposed by Johnson (D) includes more than $60 million from the Prince George's side of the commission. If the commission takes an $18 million hit, it might be hard-pressed to provide that assistance without changing plans for projects that include improvements to parks and athletic facilities throughout the county. The agency might have to borrow money for projects or delay or scuttle them, officials said.

Lacking a tax cap, the commission accumulated large surpluses during the real estate boom, when property assessments -- and tax bills -- soared. That surplus has led the county to rely increasingly on commission funds for its budget, a practice that recently drew negative attention from a Wall Street rating agency.

In a letter Thursday to Dernoga, Johnson responded to the projected revenue loss by recommending that the commission reduce or forgo pay increases, new jobs and program enhancements and use bonds to fund capital projects rather than cash.

The budget dilemma stems largely from an amendment added to the tax cap bill late in the session by Sen. Douglas J.J. Peters (D-Prince George's). Dubbed a "technical amendment" -- which typically would not significantly affect legislation -- the change was approved with little study, several members said.

Taxes residents pay to the commission are based on property assessments, and the new measure would place a cap on how much of a home's value could be taxed. Peters's amendment would exempt portions of past assessment increases when calculating future taxes, which would lead to a more immediate tax break for residents and a more dramatic revenue loss for the commission.

"There was no indication there was any substantive impact," Del. Melony G. Griffith (D-Prince George's), chairman of the county's delegation in the House, said of the amendment. She said she was in favor of a tax break but wanted the change implemented more gradually to lessen the impact on the commission.

"It was not my intention to put projects that were planned in jeopardy," she said.

Peters said he added the amendment so residents would reap the benefits of the tax cap as quickly as possible.

Once the amendment was adopted, the park and planning agency lobbied unsuccessfully in the final days of the legislative session to have it removed. Members of the county delegation were given lists of commission projects in their districts that were described as "on the chopping block" because of the potential revenue loss.

"The bottom line is that the amendment will push the Commission into a deficit very quickly because it accelerates the existing imbalance," said Adrian Gardner, general counsel for the park and planning agency, in a letter to the county's Senate delegation.

"Many of you have inquired about the Commission's financial situation . . . and some openly claim the Commission has 'too much' money," he wrote. "Please understand this is not correct."

It's unclear just how much the commission can spare this year and whether projects will be shelved. In the meantime, the continued practice of the commission's helping to fund the county budget has drawn the glare of Fitch Ratings. In a February report on the commission's bond rating, Fitch stated that "additional transfers of commission funds to support county operations could result in a rating downgrade."

Staff writer Ovetta Wiggins contributed to this report.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Recent Prince George's County News (24 Mar 2010)

  • rt @ PGCrimeSolvers Become a FAN of Prince Geoge's County Crime Solvers Facebook page @ www.facebook.com/pgcrimesovlers 
Public Safety
2010 Election
  • Post: Political slates make campaign finance murky in Md. http://bit.ly/dxvb3P (mentions several PG politicians using the gimmick)
  • Examiner.com (JKitchen): Report on Mar 23 County Executive Debate http://bit.ly/c0Zal8 Kitchen impressed by Jackson, some discussion of TRIM 
  • Gazette: Candidates start wooing business community http://bit.ly/bkGra1 (Mentions R. Baker (ce), A, Turner (c6), T. Dernoga (sa))
  • rt @ ABC7News Ehrlich to Run for Governor : http://clkurl.com/i.cfm/tw719032 
  • PGPolice:UPDATE: Critical Missing Juvenile Located, Margennae Lashawn Dixon (2697) http://bit.ly/c0qMOI 
2010 General Assembly
  • Budget
    • rt @marylandmoment Emotions run deep in Senate budget debate http://bit.ly/cxlHOS 
    • MDPolWatch: MD senate vote on bill to make state budget look balanced by making counties pay for teacher pensions http://bit.ly/cZHrTv ...  For making counties pay for teacher pensions: Miller, Currie, Against: Exum, Harrington, Muse, Peters, Pinsky, Rosapepe 
    • MDReporter: Sen. gives tentative approval to gov. $32 billion budget http://bit.ly/ckf2P8 Quotes Sen Pinsky (D-22 & teachers union employee) 
    • Sun: House rejects Senate cut of transportation funds http://bit.ly/9jhwAA Quotes Del. Gaines, D-22, committee chair 
    • rt @marylandmoment Pr. Geo's officials praise potential $18 million addition to state aid: http://bit.ly/9GEMFu
  • Gambling at Rosecroft
    • rt @marylandmoment: MD Senate passes bill to put card games at Rosecroft track: Statewide vote... http://bit.ly/9BRmV8 
    • Sun: Sen passes bill that lets voters decide on card games at Rosecroft http://bit.ly/cHa7tv Spons by Muse, D-26, quotes Del. Griffith, D-25
    • Post: Md. Senate passes bill to put card games at Rosecroft http://bit.ly/9maExj Sen Muse, D-26: "desperation move" to keep the track afloat
    • Examiner: Md. Senate approves gambling at Rosecroft Raceway http://bit.ly/aSLcs0 
  • Sun: Senate panel rejects change in death-penalty criteria; Miller (D-27) bid to ease prosecution countered by Frosh http://bit.ly/ckVaHC 
  • rt @ ABC7News Md. OKs Auto Liability Insurance Hike : http://clkurl.com/i.cfm/tw718923 Will raise premium costs and taxes 
  • rt @bcbolin RT @anacostiaws: Speak out against clean water rollbacks in MD! http://ow.ly/1qtV7a 
  • rt @ MDReporter Pimlico auction cancelled, governor's unemployment insurance reform passes, & card games vote in Nov? http://bit.ly/9GBtJI 
  • rt @ CNSmd House passes bill making intimidation using a swastika or noose a hate crime. 7 del. vote against. (Majority hates free speech)
  • rt @ CNSmd House passes water-quality loan bill 114-26. Min. Leader O'Donnell apologizes to grandchildren for "mortgaging their futures." 
  • rt @MDReporter Child care workers would be able to unionize under a bill in the House. http://bit.ly/bnO66u 
  • rt @mdchamber Finance comm rejected bill to prohibit employers from using applicant's credit history when making hiring decisions. 6-5 vote 
Other Politics
  • TheAgitator: Obama’s promise not to tax middle class takes another tumble, he won’t tax you so long as you don’t smoke or use tanning salons 

Monday, January 18, 2010

Prince George's police promote corporal found guilty of nine disciplinary charges

Monica D. Packer v. Alphonso Hayes; Prince George's County, Maryland.
U. S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, 29 Oct 2003.

Pr. George's Officer Faces Hearing in Handling of Cases.
Post, 5 Mar 2009 (Davis).

Officer Found Guilty In Failed Investigations.
Post, 6 Mar 2009 (Davis).
A disciplinary panel of Prince George's County police officers determined yesterday that a fellow officer repeatedly failed to follow through on investigations and participate in prosecutions of defendants he arrested, actions his former supervisor said allowed at least a dozen suspects in armed carjackings and robberies to go free or receive vastly reduced sentences. . . .
Prince George's Lets an Officer Off Easy.
Post, 13 Mar 2009 (Letter to the editor).
. . . I'm offended that it took this long for him to be punished and that the punishment will be so inadequate. It's past time for the legislature to look into independent oversight and true accountability.
Despite findings against him, Prince George's County police corporal promoted.
Post, 18 Jan 2010 (Zapotosky).
Prince George's County police Cpl. Alphonso J. Hayes repeatedly failed to follow through on investigations and participate in the prosecution of suspects he arrested, according to a police disciplinary panel. His former supervisor testified in March that Hayes's actions left at least a dozen carjacking and robbery suspects with vastly reduced sentences or with no penalties.

The accusations, and the panel's guilty finding last year, apparently posed no professional detriment to Hayes. Friday, the department elevated him to the rank of sergeant, ending the nearly four-year period "hold" on his promotion while the accusations were investigated.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

PG Police Furloughs Deemed Unconstitutional

So there will be layoffs because our elected officials violated the rights of the employees--and broke their solemn oaths to obey the Maryland and U.S. Constitutions.

It seems to me that it would only be fair to (1) punish and (2) layoff the officials responsible, including the county executive and all the members of the council.

But, as usual, the bad guys will not be held personally accountable for doing wrong.  The rest of us--not the individuals responsible--will have to pay the consequences.

Note that the judge who made this decision is a former Prince George's County States Attorney--Jack Johnson's predecessor in that position.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:03 AM, D. Foskey <dfoskey@crowell.com> wrote:


Comment:  FOP Union wins  but does thia win translate to permanent layoffs and/or reduction of our police force?  Where is the County Council going to "find the funds" to cause furloughed police officers made whole in recovering lost wages?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/18/AR2009081803415.html

County Furloughs Unconstitutional, U.S. Judge Rules

Pr. George's Might Have to Repay Wages





Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Prince George's County violated the U.S. Constitution when it furloughed 5,900 workers in the last fiscal year, a decision that could force the county to repay millions in wages in the midst of a crippling economic downturn.
The ruling, which the county plans to appeal, has the potential to upend a key Prince George's strategy for combating deficits. A county spokesman said in a statement that the decision would result in "massive layoffs" if it stands.
"As a result of this [economic] crisis, the county made a difficult decision to furlough its employees for 10 days, saving $17 million," James P. Keary, spokesman for County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D), said in the statement. "The court has substituted its judgment without acknowledging the economic challenges facing the country. . . . In order to protect their jobs and the lives of employees and their families we will be filing an appeal to remedy this irresponsible decision."
But U.S. District Judge Alexander Williams Jr. wrote that although he is mindful that local governments are facing financial challenges "in the midst of a global recession," officials could have turned to other "more moderate alternatives" to trim the budget.
"Although the County suggests to the Court that it faced dire circumstances and had no other reasonable alternatives, the record suggests otherwise and the County's actions resemble trappings of doing that which was politically expedient," Williams wrote in his 43-page opinion.
Last month, the County Council approved a second round of 10-day furloughs for the new fiscal year that started in July. In light of the ruling, a union leader Tuesday called on the county to halt implementation of those furloughs, though it is unclear whether that will happen. It also remains to be seen whether the ruling will set a precedent for other jurisdictions, which have considered furloughs as revenue has fallen below expectations.
Vince Canales, president of the county's Fraternal Order of Police -- one of the plaintiffs in the suit -- said he was pleased with the judge's ruling, but is ready for a long legal battle.
"We were always very optimistic that we would be successful," Canales said. "We're very happy with the decision from the judge, but we are aware that this is just a first step in a long process."
Several unions filed suit against the county last year, alleging that officials violated collective bargaining agreements by imposing the furloughs. In his opinion, Williams sided with the unions on one of three counts, finding that the county violated the contract clause of the U.S. Constitution, which bars states from passing laws "impairing the obligation of contracts."
The furloughs reduced employees' "salaries/wages and hours," which were guaranteed under contracts "not subject to unilateral adjustment by the County," Williams wrote. "To find otherwise would render the contracts virtually meaningless."
Williams ordered both sides to "consult and discuss the means and manner of refunding any monies owed to Union employees as a result of having complied with the [furlough plan], and, if necessary, submit a joint proposal for the Court's approval" within 10 days.
He sided with the county on two other counts, which alleged that the furlough plan violated the county's personnel laws.
Williams also wrote that the ruling "is not a pronouncement regarding furloughs in general" but applies to the specific circumstances in Prince George's.



__._,_.___


To subscribe, send an email to:
PG-Politics-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
PG-Politics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
To post, send an email to:
PG-Politics@yahoogroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

2010 Candidates: Rushern Baker's Campaign site

Rushern Baker's campaign for county executive now has a web site at:
http://www.rushernbaker.com

Flash and graphics may cause it to load slowly if you have a dial-up connection.

Baker, for those who have not followed him closely, was largely responsible for both (1) taking away our right to vote for school board members, and (2) bypassing TRIM to sock us with  a regressive telephone tax--one of the highest such taxes in the nation.

In my opinion, Baker is probably both more honest and more competent than the current county executive, but has demonstrated that he cannot be trusted by those of us who value self-governance and fiscal restraint.

(Posted 27 May 2009)

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Fwd: State Legislators Help Jack slide Tax Increase in at Last Second - Tell Your Friends

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eri Maren <eri.maren@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:15 AM
Subject: State Legislators Help Jack slide Tax Increase in at Last Second - Tell Your Friends
To: eri.maren@hotmail.com


State Legislators Help Jack slide Tax Increase in at Last Second - Tell Your Friends!!

HB 1132 is a sneaky bill that circumvents the TRIM Property Tax Rate cap. 


When Jack Johnson tried to float a repeal of the Homestead Property Tax credit last month, he also had a back-up plan: HB 1132

HB 1132 has been sitting untouched for weeks, but now that the Soccer Stadium excitement is over, the SAME PEOPLE are SNEAKING in a tax increase over the last weekend when you aren't ready for it!! 

See the Gazette from a month ago - it talks about all 3 of Jax Tax Grabs: 


HB 1132 looks uneventful - it lets the County spend WSTC Tax funds (Transit tax funds) on school busses. How bad is that? The intent is to raise the WSTC Tax rate A LOT in order to use the new funds to pay for the $100 million school bus cost - instead of using the money for TRANSIT  - its intended purpose. So, if the County is going to use WSTC money to pay for general County costs... what's the difference in raising the general County tax rate? Well, the difference is that TRIM is supposed to apply to the COunty rate and prevent run-ups in expenses. But Jack Johnson is working with Senator Muse and Delegate Griffith to pick your pocket while you aren't looking!

The WSTC tax applies to your property tax assessment. Right now, it is 2.6 cents. You see this tax on your property tax bill after the County, State, MNCPPC and Storm water  taxes. 

Only the County tax is subject to the TRIM limit. Thus, the County can circumvent TRIM by getting permission to raise the WSTC rate to whatever it wants. Jack is talking about raising it to 7.5 cents or higher! That's right, a 300% tax increase, and it doesn't even go to Transit. 

Also, this is on top of the Legislature having decided to take $60 million of your MNCPPC - (which you overpaid) - and GIVING it to the County to pay for its bloated budget. http://mlis.state.md.us/2009rs/billfile/hb1517.htm 

That's right, first they are going to take $60 million that you overpaid, and then they are going to raise your tax rate through the backdoor!


WRITE YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS BELOW: 

Tell them that you don't want to see the TRIM tax rate cap circumvented. 


Dear Legislator: 

I oppose HB 1132. It is dishonest to create a Transit Tax and then use the funds generated to pay for the general fund excesses of the County Executive. This is nothing more than a backdoor repeal of TRIM - which voters have repeatedly told you not to touch. Sneaking in a tax to circumvent TRIM in the last days of the session is NOT listening to voters. Tell Jack Johnson to balance his budget without raiding my wallet. Homeowners are suffering as much as anyone and we cannot afford more. 

Sincerely, 

---------------




Senators

<jim.rosapepe@senate.state.md.us>,  <paul.pinsky@senate.state.md.us>,  <douglas.peters@senate.state.md.us>,  <nathaniel.exum@senate.state.md.us>,  <ulysses.currie@senate.state.md.us>,  <anthony.muse@senate.state.md.us>,  <thomas.v.mike.miller@senate.state.md.us>,  <david.harrington@senate.state.md.us>


Delegates


<ben.barnes@house.state.md.us>, <barbara.frush@house.state.md.us>,  <joseline.pena.melnyk@house.state.md.us>,  <tawanna.gaines@house.state.md.us>,  <anne.healey@house.state.md.us>, <justin.ross@house.state.md.us>,  <james.hubbard@house.state.md.us>,  <gerron.levi@house.state.md.us>,  <marvin.holmes@house.state.md.us>,  <joanne.benson@house.state.md.us>,  <carolyn.howard@house.state.md.us>,  <michael.vaughn@house.state.md.us>,  <aisha.braveboy@house.state.md.us>,  <dereck.davis@house.state.md.us>,  <melony.griffith@house.state.md.us>,  <veronica.turner@house.state.md.us>,  <kris.valderrama@house.state.md.us>,  <jay.walker@house.state.md.us>, <james.proctor@house.state.md.us>,  <joseph.vallario@house.state.md.us>,  <doyle.niemann@house.state.md.us>,  <jolene.ivey@house.state.md.us>,  <victor.ramirez@house..state.md.us>


Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Re: MC/PG116- 09 - TRANSIT TAX OVERTURNS TRIM, AS DAMAGING AS PG414 (HOMESTEAD) -

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 5:00 PM, robinsonawjr <robinsonawjr@yahoo.com> wrote:

Even more damaging thaN Homestead percentage increase bill is
MC/PG116-09 transit tax. It is a stealth bill and its impact cannot
be determined by reading it. It has the effect of overturning TRIM,
and I believe is under the radar for delegates. I believe they are
seeking cover, and believe they can pass 116 because you don't know
what this bill truly does (raises property tax 5 cents per hundred).
I will give you a better explanation tomorrow, but we had better be
holding the delegations' feet to the fire on both PG414 and MC/PG116-
09. they both raise taxes; they both open the barn door; they both
violate voter placed protections / they both overturn TRIM directly
and indirectly. Jack stated that MC/PG116 will raise $36million /
this will be done on the backs of homeowners.

HB 1132 (MC/PG 116-09
Entitled:  Washington Suburban Transit District - Transit Facilities - Public School Transportation 
Synopsis:
Establishing that, for specified purposes relating to the Washington Suburban Transit District, in Prince George's County the definition of "transit facilities" includes all matters and things utilized in rendering public school transportation; etc.

Recent News about Prince George's County

  • Gazette: Rent and repeat; Homeowners asked to pay more taxes while Johnson leases more office space (Editorial) http://tinyurl.com/bd45gr 

  • Gazette: Résumé for the next county executive (Letter, 11 signers) http://tinyurl.com/a9lznr 

  • Gazette: Johnson's math doesn't add up (Letter, Paul Cooper) http://tinyurl.com/csclmd 

  • Gazette: Mt. Rainier Ordinance could ban couches on porches (Izadi) http://tinyurl.com/byuexk 

  • Gazette: Johnson considers run for state office; Won't rule out challenge to O'Malley; may drop tax increase http://tinyurl.com/cboogl 

  • Gazette: County to add $1.7 million in leases Leaders, residents question decisions during fin. crisis (Valentine) http://tinyurl.com/crj729 

  • Post: PG Schools; $71 Mil. More in Cuts Proposed; Latest Trims to Bring Total Jobs Lost to Over 1,000 (Hernandez) http://tinyurl.com/c5sehx 

  • Post: A Bad Deal for Md. Taxpayers [Stadium] (Marc Fisher) http://tinyurl.com/b8xs2r 

  • Post: Victim of Fatal Seat Pleasant Stabbing Identified (Davis) http://tinyurl.com/cpxtmk, also see GoryPG: http://tinyurl.com/cqbmx5 

  • Post: Soccer Stadium 'Lacked a Champion'; As Talks in D.C. Faltered, Pr. George's Officials Stepped Forward http://tinyurl.com/cp93gb 

  • Post: WSSC Board Recommends 9% Rate Hike (Katherine Shaver) http://tinyurl.com/d3ynjh 



  • Washington Informer: Residents Outraged at Proposed Property Tax Increase (Odell Ruffin) http://tinyurl.com/auxyv4 



  • Gazette: As Hylton takes charge, police revamp community approach, hope strategy educes crime by landmark levels http://tinyurl.com/ad4548

  • Post: PG Robbery Suspect (a convicted murderer) Acquitted Because of Lax Police Work, Juror Says (Castaneda) http://tinyurl.com/b9pmct 

  • WTOP & Post: Body found near West Hyattsville Metro (http://tinyurl.com/dbfp48, http://tinyurl.com/bzxhff) 





  • (Posted 19 Feb 2009)

    Saturday, February 14, 2009


    (Posted 14 Feb 2009)

    Friday, February 13, 2009

    Reports from County Budget (tax increase) Forum

    To: PG-Politics@yahoogroups.com

    From: Observer
    Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:04:50 -0500
    Subject: [PG-Politics] Busted Budget Forum Bursts at Seams

    Hundreds and hundreds of irascible voters choked the auditorium at PG Community College last night. About halfway through the four-hour fusillade of citizen complaints, Junket Jack remarked that he had "never seen turnout like this for a meeting before [emphasis his]." What's more, I've never seen a gathering where the County Executive acknowledged and announced the (few) other politicians in the room, only to have them shrink into the crowd about as fast as they possibly could. Seems they weren't to eager to be associated with Johnson or his budget proposal. Certainly, none joined him on the stage.  It's clear that a whole lot of taxpayers are hopping mad about the TRIM bypass and the accelerated property tax hike (myself included).

    I truly fear for the County's Annapolis delegation.  Please pardon my French, but there is a political sh*tstorm headed their way.

    ---Andy Carruthers

    To: PG-Politics@yahoogroups.com
    From: "Judy Robinson"
    Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:09:00 -0000
    Subject: [PG-Politics] Re: Busted Budget Forum Bursts at Seams

    I testified last night and brought a visual showing the growth of
    county government. In 2003, operating budget was $1.7 billion / In
    2009, operating budget was $2.6 billion. Jack Johnson and Marilyn
    Bland, who refused to answer my question regarding the council's new
    cars, were almost booed out of the hall. Jack dithered and kept
    talking endlessly - People are angry, and I encouraged them to let the
    state legislators know their feelings. 


    (Posted 13 Feb 2009)

    Friday, February 06, 2009

    TRIM truth, Re: Update: Jack Johnson's contempt for the voters and county charter

    On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Patricia Douglas <patriciadouglas08@yahoo.com> wrote:
    The TRIM property tax cap was put in place by white Prince George's County residents in the late-70s because they didn't want to see their tax dollars going to pay for the increasingly black school system that they were pulling their kids out of.  Now, middle and upper class blacks are doing their work for them, because they to, by and large, have pulled their kids out of the public schools.  TRIM was founded in racism.  I think Jack Johnson's government has been incompetent, but that is no reason to hamstring future, and hopefully more competent, county executives and councils. 
    White business owners (developers in particular), mostly who live outside of Prince George's County, still control politics in the county, with their money and influence ofver black officials.  Same game, different day.
    TRIM was not founded in racism, it founded in distrust.  Voter distrust of dishonest politicians.  Elected officials who raised taxes "for the schools" or "for public safety," but spent the money on something else, then cried poor and raided taxes again "for the schools" or "for public safety."
    And then kept repeating the cycle.
    I will believe that the county really needs more money when, and only when,

    • Jack's entourage disappears and he drives his own car.
    • ALL "deputy director" positions are eliminated.
    • All consulting contracts to Friends of Jack or friends of anyone else are eliminated.
    • The county and schools stop spending millions of dollars to improve offices for bureaucrats (or for luxury gyms) and use the money they have to fix deteriorating schools.
    • The school system administrative overhead is dramatically reduced.
    • All of the seemingly dozens or hundreds of committees and commissions are defunded, or if any are really essential, put on an absolute minimal budget.
    • Glossy vanity publications like  "Gorgeous Prince George's" and the similar council publication are eliminated to cut back to essential information printed with black ink on cheap white recycled paper.
    We have no guarantee that any increased revenues will be used as promised.  In fact, the record of the county government over the past several decades shows us that increased revenues are generally NOT used as promised.  
    People who are willing to let the county raise taxes are as just gullible as Charlie Brown was when year after year after year he was stupid enough to believe that this time Lucy would not pull the football away.

    Update: Jack Johnson's contempt for the voters and county charter

    Comment: Although the media have reported on Jack Johnson's continuing attempts to raise taxes, reporting on spending issues has been weak.

    Most reporting seems to be based on what Johnson says, or on the reactions of a relatively limited group of people.

    Virtually every news report about county's fiscal situation begins by uncritically quoting Jack Johnson. I have yet to read a report that discusses or examines the accuracy of Johnson's extreme claims that without higher taxes he "would have to devastate our government," . . . "We just don't have the money to operate our government.".

    We have seen a few reports on Johnson's junkets to Africa, on contracts for his cronies, and on large payouts to the victims of police misconduct, but no independent in-depth reporting that looks critically at all county spending, connects all the dots, explains how Johnson got the county into this mess, or explores all the options available for dealing with the problem.

    Johnson Pushing Property Tax Bump;Executive Warns of Layoffs.
    Post, 6 Feb 2009 (Wiggins ).
    Desperate to raise money for basic county services, Prince George's County Executive Jack B. Johnson is asking state lawmakers to approve a bill that would raise the size of annual property tax increases.
    * * *
    The County Council has not taken a position on the proposals, according to Chairman Marilynn Bland (D-Clinton).

    Thirty years ago, voters in Prince George's created some of the country's strictest barriers to tax increases by imposing a cap on property taxes and placing a requirement in the county charter that tax increases must be approved by voters.

    Judy Robinson, a supporter of property tax caps, said Johnson is trying to circumvent the charter by proposing changes to the homestead tax credit.
    * * *
    Prince George's House Delegation Chairwoman Melony G. Griffith (D) said she introduced the legislation as a courtesy to Johnson. She said her sponsorship does not imply that she supports the bill.
    * * *
    Last year, Johnson tried to raise the local telephone tax from 8 percent to 11 percent of monthly bills to generate $17 million a year for schools. The tax would have cost residents as much as an additional $1.50 per bill, according to county officials. In November, voters overwhelmingly rejected the idea in a referendum.

    "Doesn't that tell you how willing people are to have new taxes?" Robinson asked
    Recently:

    (Posted 6 Feb 2009)

    Thursday, February 05, 2009

    Johnson makes plea to delegates to raise property tax

    Johnson makes plea to delegates to raise property tax; Council has not taken a position; delegates voice concerns.
    Gazette, 5 Feb 2009 (Valentine).
    In his first public speech on a tax increase, Prince George's County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D) told a panel of 17 state delegates Wednesday that raising taxes will be the only way to avoid laying off county police and teachers and prevent making deep budget cuts this summer.
    * * *
    Johnson was alone in asking for the increase on Wednesday. Delegates questioned the proposal for two hours without voting, noting that even County Council members would not speak in its favor.

    "This legislation is new to us. It just came out," said Council Chairwoman Marilynn M. Bland (D-Dist. 9) of Clinton, who sat beside Johnson as he made the proposal, along with council members Samuel Dean (D-Dist. 6) of Mitchellville and Camille Exum (D-Dist. 7) of Capitol Heights.
    * * *
    The prospect of raising taxes is already creating a political nightmare for delegates and county lawmakers, who have been fielding angry e-mails and calls since the proposal was reported by The Gazette earlier this week. Johnson is in his last two years as executive due to term limits, but several County Council members, delegates and senators all face a potential run for office in November 2010.

    Some legislators have called the proposal "political suicide."
    * * *
    "We could be doing some real heavy lifting, only to have our limbs cut off," said Del. Marvin E. Holmes Jr. (D-Dist. 23B) of Kettering.

    "We'll take it to the floor for you — if we have to," Del Gerron S. Levi (D-Dist. 23A) of Bowie told council members after the meeting. "But we don't know if we're there yet."
    * * *
    "You're asking us to override the local government," said Del. Anne Healey (D-Dist. 22) of Hyattsville. "This homestead tax was set by referendum years ago."
    [More]

    (Posted 5 Feb 2009)

    Thursday, November 08, 2007

    Slots & Taxes: What our legislators are saying (part 13)

    (Posted 8 Nov 2007)

    Budget Revisions Prompt Questions; Focus Is on Switch in Services to Be Taxed.
    Post, 8 Nov 2007 (Rucker & Wiggins).
    Budget writers in the Maryland Senate were peppered with questions yesterday about whether their deficit reduction plan protects the interests of working families and why they had decided, with no public debate, to propose taxing landscaping, video arcades and visits from the Geek Squad and other computer services.
    * * *
    If we fail, we will be simply sticking our heads in the sand," Sen. Ulysses Currie (D-Prince George's), chairman of the Budget and Taxation Committee, told his colleagues.

    Currie's panel voted Tuesday night to make several significant changes to proposals by Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) in the special legislative session. Among the amendments that received the most attention yesterday was the panel's proposal to apply the state sales tax to landscaping, arcades and computer services.

    Legislative analysts said taxing those services would yield about $250 million a year in revenue, far more than would be generated by taxing a handful of other services, including health clubs and tanning salons, that O'Malley had specified and that were the subject of public hearings. Those were taken out of the bill after an outcry by those affected.

    Sen. Richard F. Colburn (R-Dorchester) asked Currie whether landscapers, arcade owners and computer service operators knew that levies would be placed on their services. "Or did they wake up this morning and look at the paper and find out we're in?" he said.

    "I think you summed up the process," Currie replied.
    * * *
    O'Malley wants to revive tax cuts; Senate eliminates proposals aimed at reductions for most Marylanders.
    Sun, 8 Nov 2007 (Green).
    * * *
    "Landscapers, people who have computer services businesses, people with video-game parlors -- were they able to come and testify, or did they just wake up this morning, read the newspaper and realize they were in?" Sen. Richard F. Colburn, an Eastern Shore Republican, asked Sen. Ulysses Currie, the committee chairman, during a floor debate.

    "I think you summarized the process," Currie replied.
    * * *
    Md. Budget Crisis: Senate Could Finish Work Thursday, Amid Complaints About Pace of Debate.
    Southern Maryland Online, 8 Nov 2007 (Becker).
    * * *
    Sen. Paul Pinsky, D-Prince George's, said he "didn't like the income tax rates being flattened" and objected that the language to close corporate loopholes was thrown out. Those changes might lead Pinsky to vote against the proposals.

    "I might have to do more than just pinch my nose" this time, he said.

    But Pinsky believes the proposals will be voted on soon and likely passed.

    "Is it fast? Yes, it's fast," he said. "But I've learned when you have the votes, you can do almost anything" in Annapolis.
    * * *
    Senators try to undo higher ed casualties.
    Diamondback, 8 Nov 2007 (Epstein).
    Two state senators said yesterday they intend to put legislation dedicating funding aimed at holding down tuition at the state's colleges and universities back on firm ground.

    Student leaders and officials from the board that governs Maryland's colleges and universities blasted Annapolis lawmakers yesterday for tying the future of higher education funding to a controversial proposal that would legalize slot machines.

    But Sen. Jim Rosapepe, who represents Prince George's and Anne Arundel Counties, and Sen. Robert Zirkin, of Baltimore County, said they will introduce an amendment today that would instead devote money from a corporate tax increase to higher education funding, which was part of Democratic Gov. Martin O'Malley's original budget proposal.
    * * *
    Rosapepe said he didn't think senators intentionally put higher education funding at risk.

    "I think the committee didn't quite understand what it was doing," he said, adding that the members had to consider a number of amendments in a short time and might not have fully considered the impact of their decision.

    "There's a lot of interest in restoring that money," Rosapepe said.
    Progress for budget deficit in special session described as 'slow'.
    Bowie Blade-News, 8 Nov 2007 (Armes).
    * * *
    "Members of the House and Senate have been working together on aspects of all avenues of this legislation, and we're all trying to get a good perspective," Del. Jim Hubbard, D-Bowie 23A, said.

    "We're trying to make what cuts we can make, looking to eliminate around $600 million of the existing budget before raising revenues while also trying to see if we can provide health care for more than 100,000 Maryland residents," he added.

    Del. Gerron Levi, D-Bowie 23A, said there is a "broad consensus" among elected officials regarding four main business areas that could see tax increases: the sales tax, real estate taxes, the corporate loophole income tax and the tobacco tax.

    "The slots proposal is truly up in the air right now," she said. "I think there will be two votes on it - a referendum and then the actual bill, and there's more support for the referendum right now."

    Levi credited the various committees for making "tremendous progress" toward finding solutions but also indicated the pace has been measured because of the impact of their decisions.

    "The issue of where the cuts are going to be made is still being addressed, and it must be addressed before we can talk about revenue generators for the state," local Del. Marvin Holmes, D-Bowie 23B, said. "Generally, it's a lot to get your hands on. You know the material because it's not intellectually complicated. But it's a lot to handle."
    * * *
    Holmes estimated the special session would likely conclude a few days after Thanksgiving to allow the conference committees to discuss the bills and for the delegates to vote on their decisions. But Hubbard and Levi were optimistic the session would end sooner, possibly by the end of next week.

    "The bottom line is, we're trying to raise about $1 billion for tax cuts, and we're trying to do it without hurting any particular demographic or geographic group," Hubbard said. "It's our job to make sure Bowie doesn't get hurt in any of this and to do what we think is fair across the board."

    "We need to keep in mind that we're in a crisis here," said State Sen Douglas J.J. Peters, D-Bowie. "Somehow we need to generate a certain amount of revenues by the end of the year. We've seen how complicated it is to tinker with the tax code. Once we leave, we'll either pass the bills or there will be dramatic cuts that will heavily influence the people of Prince George's County and Bowie."

    Peters believes the session could finish by the end of next week.
    Committee OKs bulk of state's health insurance expansion, sends bill to full Senate.
    Annapolis Capital, 8 Nov 2007 (Zieminski).
    A Senate committee gave preliminary approval Wednesday to a $200 million health care expansion, after striking a key provision that would have helped small-business owners pay for health insurance they currently offer.
    * * *
    Sen. E.J. Pipkin, R-Queen Anne's, a vocal opponent of the bill, questioned the administration's decision to expand health care in the midst of a budget shortfall.

    "The idea we'd come back to fix the deficit by raising $1.5 billion in taxes and expand health care is outrageous," Pipkin said after voting against the bill in committee Wednesday evening.

    Middleton said lawmakers can always come back and trim the bill if O'Malley's plan to balance the budget is not passed. The health insurance bill is scheduled to be heard on the Senate floor Thursday along with major parts of O'Malley's budget proposals.

    Democratic Sens. John Astle, Catherine Pugh, Robert Garagiola, George Della, Nathaniel Exum, Delores Kelley, Katherine Klausmeier and Middleton voted in favor of the bill in committee. Sen. Allan Kittleman, R-Howard, voted against it and Sen. J. Robert Hooper, R-Harford, was absent.
    * * *
    If It's Not About Budget, Forget It.
    Post, 8 Nov 2007 (Wiggins & Helderman).
    Del. Doyle L. Niemann (D-Prince George's) wants to set up an authority and put an end to the financial woes that have plagued Prince George's Hospital Center.

    Del. Barbara A. Frush (D-Prince George's) says the state should cut funding for the intercounty connector, the controversial highway that would link Prince George's and Montgomery counties.

    And Del. Joseline A. Pena-Melnyk (D-Prince George's) wants to place the balance on unused gift certificates into a fund for education.
    * * *
    More than 50 bills have been introduced during the special session. Most offer alternative ways to close the projected shortfall, but many of the bills, such as those introduced by Niemann, Frush and Pena-Melnyk, have nothing to do with the state's budget problem.
    * * *
    Niemann said he expects his bill to be assigned to the committee, but he hopes the issue will be taken up in some form.

    "There is sentiment in the delegation that the issue needs to be resolved," he said. "The governor wants us to go out on a limb to support him, and we want some support for one of our most serious problems."

    Frush said she wanted to express the county's sentiments about the intercounty connector with the introduction of her bill.

    "The county doesn't want it, the County Council doesn't want it, those delegates who are affected don't want it. It's just wrong," she said. "It's a bad way to spend money, especially at a time when our money is scarce."

    Other budget-related bills will get a full airing.

    Sen. James C. Rosapepe (D-Prince George's) introduced a bill that would raise the cigarette tax by $1.44 instead of the $1-a-pack suggested by the governor.

    And Del. Justin D. Ross (D-Prince George's) proposed that a sales tax be imposed when people get tattoos or body piercings, when they get their swimming pool or hot tub cleaned and when they hire movers or get their homes decorated.

    "They are good examples of luxury items," Ross said. "This is something people do with discretionary income. You can clean your own pool; you choose not to. You can decorate your own house; you choose not to."
    Johnson to hospital: Survival issue will be 'off table'
    Laurel Leader, 8 Nov 2007 (Pichaske).
    * * *
    State Del. Barbara Frush of Beltsville, whose district includes Laurel and who is chairwoman of the county's House delegation, said Nov. 6 that state lawmakers were studying the proposal and would come up with a counter-proposal within a day or two.

    The main sticking points, she said, are where the money will come from (the bailout is estimated to cost about $350 million in county and state money) and the disposition of the land, now owned by the county, on which the hospitals sit.

    United front sought

    Frush said state and county lawmakers are laboring to come up with a plan they can all agree on. If they do, they will present it to Gov. Martin O'Malley during the ongoing special legislative session, called by the governor to address the state's budget shortfall.

    Both Johnson and Frush said the Prince George's lawmakers plan to make their support for O'Malley's proposal to deal with the shortfall contingent on his support for bailing out the county hospitals.

    "We're keeping our powder dry, so to speak, hoping we can negotiate a good outcome for our hospitals," Frush said, adding that the entire House delegation has agreed to the support-trading plan.

    "This is extremely important to the health and welfare of our citizens," she said. "We've got to do whatever it takes."
    * * *
    SGA uses laptops to lobby.
    Diamondback, 8 Nov 2007 (Austin).
    * * *
    Jim Rosapepe (D- Anne Arundel and Prince George's) said he and his colleagues are surprised with how few phone calls and e-mails they have received so far in regards to possible higher education cuts.

    "I've heard several senators say that they haven't heard much from their constituents about university funding," Rosapepe said. "A lot of other interest groups are very active in lobbying," he continued, adding that Student Government Association President Andrew Friedson has been very persistent but that "you can't rely on just a handful of people. The average student and faculty and staff needs to be making phone calls and sending e-mails."
    * * *

    Sunday, July 08, 2007

    Taxing us into poverty; how much is enough?

    Being retired and on a close to fixed income, I must watch my pennies.

    Unlike our state and county officials, I cannot extort more money from others when my costs go up or I want to buy something new or extravagant--I have to live within my income.

    This year, the percentage increase in my Medicare and supplemental health insurance premiums is more than three times the percentage increase in my Social Security and other retirement income. I have to take the money for that from my already frugal lifestyle--not steal it from someone else.

    Despite TRIM, my just-received Prince George's county tax bill is up more than 7-1/2% from last year. That is more money I have to take away from my everyday living expenses.

    Despite already sky-high gas prices, our Sen. Mike Miller wants to increase the state gas tax by 50%.

    Sen. Miller and others want to increase the state sales tax by 20%.

    Jack Johnson wants to increase the existing regressive phone tax.

    Del. Niemann wants to add a hospital tax to, at least in part, have us subsidize both incompetent management and uninsured, law-breaking, illegal immigrants.

    I could go on and on.

    Where am I going to find the money for all these new taxes? Stay home all the time? Cut out a meal or two a day? Shut down my computer and drop either my land phone or my cell phone?

    Why can't our politicians--almost all Democrats--manage the public's money the way I have to manage my money?

    How can these politicians claim to be the party of the people--for the middle class, supportive of senior citizens, etc.--when they are trying so hard to drive us toward poverty?

    One pro-tax, anti-budget-cut commentator said:

    "As for taxes, you get what you pay for. Have you been visiting our public school buildings lately? They are in a horrible state: from leaking roofs to wear and tear of forty years. That demonstrates
    that we have not been investing enough to properly maintain our capital assets."

    No! We don't get what we pay for!

    Public schools are not in a horrible state because of a lack of money--the real problem is the politician's priorities.

    Our state legislators had millions and millions of dollars that could have been used for school repairs. They selfishly chose to spend those dollars on palatial offices for themselves, not on our children.

    Our PG county government has spent millions and millions of dollars buying, leasing, and maintaining offices for county bureaucrats. Much of that money could have been spent on schools, but the bureaucrats are a higher priority than our children.

    The appointed school board and county government recently spent millions of dollars on a luxury gym rather than on school maintenance.

    Schools are in horrible shape because they are the politician's last priority.

    Looking at the long-term history of our county and state politicians, I see no reason to believe that any taxes for schools will really help the schools. Sure, they may give those dollars to the educrats, but history shows that they will take other dollars away to spend on other things. (The same will likely be true of a tax for the hospital.) Then, after they think we've forgotten, they will be back asking for higher taxes again.

    If I have to scape to make ends meet--find ways to conserve every penny--so should our government officials. If I have to get by on a fixed income, so should they. If they can't, they ought to quit and let us find someone who can.

    Tuesday, June 26, 2007

    PG Hospital Circus: Board thumbs its nose at Jack Johnson; board member Camille Exum doesn't bother to attend.

    (Posted 26 Jun 2007)
    In my opinion, the board members in question should resign, along with our incompetent and corrupt public officials--including County Executive Jack B(ozo) Johnson, council chair and credit card crook Camille Exum, and most of the rest of our council--who have refused for years to do anything positive about fixing the hospital's problems. They seem to be good at delay, obfuscation, confrontation, breaking promises, brinkmanship, and looking for sinecures for cronies, but absolutely worthless when it comes to finding or supporting any real solution.

    Hospital Conflict.
    Maryland Moment, 26 Jun 2007 (Helderman).
    When the Prince George's hospital system's board of directors voted Monday evening to reject County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D)'s demand that several members resign, the vote of one of the board members present wasn't counted. And it was a biggie.

    In a closed door session just before taking up discussion of the executive's demand, the board voted that two of its members have a conflict of interest that prevented them from voting based entirely on their allegiance to the nonprofit company, Dimensions Healthcare System.

    The group agreed that the county's two representatives on the board, Johnson Chief of Staff Michael D. Herman and County Council Chairman Camille Exum (D-Seat Pleasant) couldn't vote on the critically important item. Exum was not present at the meeting, so the decision had little impact on her. But Herman's waving hand voting that the board accept Johnson's terms was ignored by Chairman Calvin Brown and the board's clerk.
    [* * *]
    Critics of the county's role in hospital management have long argued that Exum and Herman are hopelessly conflicted when they take votes about the hospital's future as members of an independent corporate board. The boards willingness to go on record agreeing with that position only illustrates the depth of the split that now exists between hospital leaders and county officials.
    Hospital Board Refuses to Follow Executive's Call for Resignations.
    Post, 26 Jun 2007 (Helderman).
    The Prince George's hospital system's board of directors rejected yesterday a demand by County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D) that several members resign, deepening a standoff between the county and the nonprofit company that runs several county medical facilities.

    Johnson had said he would release no additional funding to the financially strapped hospital system until the board agrees to restructure itself. He demanded that four of the board's 11 members resign: the chairman, representatives of the boards of two hospitals in the system and the past president of the county's medical society. [More]
    Dimensions Healthcare board’s vote puts PG hospitals at risk.
    Examiner, 26 Jun 2007 (Fowler).

    Prince George’s hospital funding in jeopardy.
    Gazette, 26 Jun 2007 (Berger).
    . . .Board member Donald Foran, one of the members Johnson was trying to remove, compared Johnson’s request to a ‘‘ransom note.”

    Del. Doyle Niemann (D-Dist. 47) of Mount Rainier . . . said the county was irresponsibly attempting to seize power from the hospital without any plan to improve the facility.

    ‘‘This is a game of chicken,” he said. ‘‘The county is pushing the hospital to the edge and may push it over the edge.” [More]


    Union leader: Dimensions board members shouldn't resign.
    Examiner, 25 Jun 2007 (Fowler).

    Mr. Johnson's Threat; The Prince George's hospital system becomes a bargaining chip.
    Post, 24 Jun 2007 (Editorial).
    . . . Prince Georgians should be getting sick and tired of their elected officials playing Russian roulette with a hospital system that serves 180,000 people a year.Mr. Johnson's gambit, which is devoid of any long-term strategy, involves forcing out four members of the Dimensions board of directors and replacing them with his loyalists. If Dimensions refuses, Mr. Johnson warns, the county will withhold payments, starting with $2 million due by the end of June. He does not bother to explain how such a shuffle will fix a structural problem at Dimensions that has drained $55 million from county coffers in the past five years. That's probably because it won't.
    [* * *]
    For decades, the trend in Maryland and elsewhere has been for counties to get out of the business of managing hospitals; they are simply not up to the job. Unfortunately that sound lesson has been lost on officeholders in Prince George's, who see the hospital center and other Dimensions facilities as bargaining chips. By impeding the way forward to a solution for the county's hospital system, they are gambling with the health of tens of thousands of residents.
    Pr. George’s might cut off hospital funding.
    Examiner, 21 Jun 2007 (Fowler).
    Despite pledging to fund Prince George’s County Hospital system through June 2008, the county said Wednesday it would not give the operator any more money until four members of its board of directors resign. [More]
    Ultimatum For Prince George's Hospital; County Seeks 4 Resignations.
    Post, 21 Jun 2007 (Helderman & Rein).
    . . . Critics say Johnson is essentially trying to take over the system. . . .
    Standoff brewing between Dimensions, County withholds $2M from hospital, after setting strict conditions for funding.
    Gazette, 21 Jun 2007 (Berger).

    Officials Seek Resignations of 4 Hospital Board Members
    .
    Post, 15 Jun 2007 (Helderman).
    . . . "I think this is an outrageous power play on behalf of the County Council and the county executive, and it's meant to derail any serious attempt to come up with a long-term solution and to continue their domination of the hospital," said Del. Doyle L. Niemann (D-Prince George's).

    Niemann said he thought the move, if successful, would "doom" chances of reaching an agreement with state lawmakers and Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) next year.

    The hospital system has been losing money for years and has received tens of millions of dollars in public subsidies. After the General Assembly session ended April 9 with no resolution of the system's problems, Johnson and the County Council agreed to use tax dollars to keep the hospitals open through June 2008.

    At the time, hospital leaders said they did not think the county's help was conditional.

    However, Johnson has long sought Brown's ouster and greater control over the board. Keary said yesterday's action was an attempt to give the public greater say and oversight over the system. He also said that when Dimensions accepted a $5 million cash infusion from the county in February, it agreed that any future help would be contingent on a board shake-up. At that time, the council passed legislation indicating that the board would agree to a restructuring if it accepted any additional tax dollars.

    "We are going to hold them to that" agreement, Keary said. [More]

    [Note: Del. Niemann's solution includes overriding TRIM and forcing a new tax on residents of Prince George's County.]

    [Note: The Washington Times does not seem to consider this issue to be newsworthy.]